From concern to action: The Silicon Valley Barcode of Life

From concern to action: The Silicon Valley Barcode of Life

From concern to action: The Silicon Valley Barcode of Life

 Volunteers at DNA Barcoding Bioblitz, Hidden Villa Farm and Wilderness Center, June 2018. PHOTO CREDIT: Dan Quinn

Human destabilization of climate with its current and future costs and suffering make headlines daily. Related yet to some extent independent, the most current mass extinction—the seventh1 event of its kind in the nearly four billion years since life appeared on Earth—with potentially greater adverse impacts2 receives severalfold less attention3. We began the Silicon Valley Barcode of Life to further iBOL’s work to address this imbalance.

 

We grew up in Palo Alto, exploring nature in our yard, on the nearby 8,800 acre Stanford University campus, and in regional open space spanning San Francisco Bay marshes, Coast Range grassland, chaparral, and redwood forests, and Pacific Coast beaches. From an early age we participated in, and more recently we’ve led others in habitat stewardship fieldwork.

Songbirds like the hooded oriole (Icterus cucullatus) and cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), once common visitors to our yard, now come rarely if at all.

We’ve observed firsthand how humans are diminishing biodiversity. As property owners in our community have covered more land with buildings and paving, they’ve reduced and fragmented habitat4. Songbirds like the hooded oriole (Icterus cucullatus) and cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), once common visitors to our yard, now come rarely if at all. As we and those around us have relied increasingly upon products imported from around the world, we’ve introduced pests and invasive species that disrupt long-standing ecological relationships5. Oak Sudden Death, caused by a water mold (Phytophthora ramorum) thought to have entered the United States via the nursery plant trade, has killed tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) in some of our favorite hiking spots and far beyond.

PHOTO CREDIT: Jen Bayer

Feeling concern about losing the living nature we love, we’re acting to preserve it. In 2018, inspired by conservationists Daniel Janzen’s and Winnie Hallwachs’ biodiversity protection and advocacy in Årea de Conservación Guanacaste, and San Diego Barcode of Life founder Bradley Zlotnick’s biodiversity cataloging and education achievements in Southern California, we launched the Silicon Valley Barcode of Life with the purpose of using DNA barcoding to engage people in cataloging biodiversity, in learning about the importance of biodiversity to human well-being and about threats to it, and in acting to conserve it.

Taxonomy wheel graphic

Taxonomic distribution of biodiversity collected at Hidden Villa DNA Barcoding Bioblitz, June 2018. Colors in the heat tree indicate the number of samples detected.

IMAGE CREDIT: Hilary Bayer

To date we’ve actively engaged more than a hundred volunteers, directly addressed more than a thousand people in-person (pre-pandemic) and subsequent online events, and indirectly addressed several thousands more in published writing and through our website. We’ve also hand-collected 600 specimens from diverse ecosystems in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, and collected nearly 30,000 additional specimens from Malaise traps deployed in partnership with Stanford University’s Fukami Lab, the City of Palo Alto, and Hidden Villa Organic Farm and Wilderness Center.

In 2021 we were offered an opportunity to partner with the Mono Lake Committee to study arthropods of the Mono Basin. Though Mono Lake is several hundred miles across California from the Silicon Valley, we’ve vacationed in the Sierra Nevada with our family for as long as we can remember, and we’re grateful to be able to contribute to protecting its biodiversity.

In our first round of collections, we gathered 250 unique specimens within a 50-mile radius of Mono Lake by hand. With pit traps and a Malaise trap on Mono Lake Committee properties, including the Outdoor Education Center visited by hundreds of students annually, we gathered about 4,000 additional specimens.

Mantidfly

Mantidfly, family Mantispidae.
PHOTO CREDIT: Jen Bayer

Scarabeidae beetle

Monkey beetle, genus Hoplia, family Scarabaeidae PHOTO CREDIT: Jen Bayer

In 2022 we’re continuing to catalog arthropods of Silicon Valley and of the Mono Basin. In both places we have plans to deploy additional Malaise traps in partnership with local conservation and educational organizations and proceed with hand collection, engaging volunteers in these activities and in specimen processing.

We’re demonstrating how DNA barcoding can be a means to quickly and cost-effectively catalog biodiversity and thereby contribute to global and local libraries of life—a resource on which many can rely to inform science-based stewardship and enrich educational programs.

“We’re demonstrating how DNA barcoding can be a means to quickly and cost-effectively catalogue biodiversity and thereby contribute to global and local libraries of life—a resource on which many can rely to inform science-based stewardship and enrich educational programs.”

Jen and Hilary Bayer, co-founders of
Silicon Valley Barcode of Life, in front of
their first Malaise trap.

We’re looking for partners.

Silicon Valley Barcode of Life is an all-volunteer endeavor made possible by dedicated advisors, generous donors, institutional partners who share our goals, and volunteers.

Please contact us if you’re interested in assisting Silicon Valley Barcode of Life with funding, macro photography, graphic design, data uploading, Malaise trap servicing, or hand collection.

You can reach us at svbarcodeoflife@gmail.com

We gratefully acknowledge the Consulate of Canada in San Diego for kindly supporting us in facilitating this partnership with the International Barcode of Life Consortium, and the staff at the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics for the ways they’ve assisted us in learning and contributing.

References:

1. Michael R. Rampino & Shu-Zhong Shen (2019): The end-Guadalupian (259.8 Ma) biodiversity crisis: the sixth major mass extinction? Historical Biology 33(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2019.1658096

2. Cardinale BJ et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401):59-67. DOI: 10.1038/nature11148.

3. Legagneux1 P et al (2018) Our house is burning: Discrepancy in climate change vs. biodiversity coverage in the media as compared to scientific literature. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5:175. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00175

4. University of Exeter. (2018, April 13). Crowded urban areas have fewer songbirds per person. ScienceDaily. Retrieved  from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180413093836.htm

5. Dawson W et al (2017). Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1: 0186. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0186.

Written by

Silicon Valley Barcode of Life
Palo Alto, USA
Hilary Bayer

Hilary Bayer

Silicon Valley Barcode of Life
Palo Alto, USA

Don't Miss Out!

Subscribe to the iBOL Barcode Bulletin for updates on DNA barcoding efforts, the iBOL Consortium, and more.

[mc4wp_form]

comment on this article

The Barcode Bulletin moderates comments to promote an informed and courteous conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, or incoherent comments will be rejected. 

Local wildlife enthusiasts drive DNA barcode library building in the UK

Local wildlife enthusiasts drive DNA barcode library building in the UK

Local wildlife enthusiasts drive DNA barcode library building in the UK

Distribution of DNA barcode records for the United Kingdom.

IMAGE: BOLD Sytems 2020-03-10

Despite some notable achievements, such as a complete DNA barcode library for the native plants of Wales, the UK has lagged behind other European countries when it comes to growing its DNA barcode library. On BOLD there are 24,555 DNA barcode records for specimens collected in the UK (from 5,484 species) which is very similar to Austria (24,513 records, from 5,375 species), a landlocked country with roughly one third the land area and one seventh the human population. Germany leads Europe with 167,458 records from 14,805 species.

    The UK is working to catch-up through a number of high-profile initiatives designed to populate and fill gaps in the UK’s DNA barcode library and, in particular, bring BIOSCAN to UK insects.

    Distribution of DNA barcodes records for the United Kingdom.
    IMAGE: BOLD Systems from 2020-03-10

    The Darwin Tree of Life project is being led by the Wellcome Sanger Institute and involves a consortium of institutes, universities, museums, and agencies, including the Natural History Museum and Royal Botanical Gardens Kew. The project aims to deliver public DNA barcodes for 10,000 species by 2023 and ultimately sequence the genomes of all 66,000 species of plants, fungi, protozoa, and animals that are found in the UK.

    DEFRA (the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) has established a Centre of Excellence for Environmental Genomic Applications. This virtual centre recognises the absolute necessity of DNA barcode libraries to meet its aims of “applying genomics methods (eDNA and metabarcoding) to detect rare and invasive species, evaluate the effectiveness of conservation interventions, monitor the status and trends for key assemblages and taxa, and assess ecosystem health, functioning, and resilience”1.

    What is special about these initiatives is that they capitalize on the UK’s large community of local wildlife enthusiasts. A recent workshop organised by BugLife (the Invertebrate Conservation Trust) and Natural England (the UK government’s adviser for the natural environment in England) to examine “gaps” in BOLD for “key English invertebrates” brought together members of the Caddisfly Recording Scheme, Cranefly Recording Scheme, the British Dragonfly Society, the Amateur Entomologists’ Society, amongst others. The UK’s exceptional network of dedicated volunteer wildlife recorders already contribute thousands of records to taxon-focussed databases such as the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS), Local Record Centres, and through apps such as iSpot and iRecord which transmit data to the NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas.

    Ainsdale Sand Dunes National Nature Reserve, one of the most important wildlife sites in England.
    PHOTO CREDIT: Gary Hedges

    The Darwin Tree of Life project kicked off last summer about 25 km north of Liverpool at Ainsdale Sand Dunes National Nature Reserve with a DNA Bioblitz attended by a team of local recorders including National Museums Liverpool entomologists. These local experts are passionate, driven and keen to contribute to DNA barcode libraries, but don’t necessarily have background knowledge in molecular biology or a basic skill set in “wet” lab techniques.

    Participants during the World Museum DNA Barcoding Workshop in February 2020.
    PHOTO CREDIT: Leanna Dixon

    To address this we recently ran a DNA barcoding workshop at World Museum Liverpool for eleven prominent local recorders connected with the Tanyptera Project. The Tanyptera Project is a seven-year initiative funded by the Tanyptera Trust to promote the study and conservation of insects and other invertebrates in the Lancashire and Cheshire region of Northwest England. To our knowledge this was one of the first DNA barcoding workshops run solely for non-professional scientists.

    Sphecodes ferruginatus female blood bee collected in Cheshire, England.
    PHOTO CREDIT: Chloe Aldridge

    The 1.5-day workshop covered the key steps in DNA barcoding from lab to BOLD2. Participants brought along their own invertebrates collected during recent local fieldwork and all successfully produced DNA barcodes for their specimens, which included springtails, bees, a cranefly, other flies, beetles, and spiders. The specimens have been vouchered into World Museum Liverpool’s National Entomology Collection which includes over 1 million specimens, and the sequences have been submitted to BOLD. One participant was able to confirm the first record of a Nationally Scarce blood bee in Cheshire – Sphecodes ferruginatus – raising interesting hypotheses about its potential host species.

    At National Museums Liverpool, together with the Tanyptera Project, we are committed to continue developing our DNA barcoding educational offering for local wildlife enthusiasts and supporting their work driving forward national initiatives to get more UK barcodes onto BOLD.

    References:

    1. Nelson M, Woodcock P, Maggs C (2018) Using eDNA and metabarcoding for nature conservation. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC 18 25). Available at http://data.jncc.gov.uk/data/99e1f69f-c438-439f-8401-dd8a6ce17320/JNCC18-25-Using-eDNA-and-Metabarcoding-for-Nature-Conservation.pdf

    2. Wilson JJ, Sing KW, Jaturas N (2019) DNA barcoding: Bioinformatics workflows for beginners. In Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. The A to Z of Bioinformatics. Ranganathan S, Nakai K, Gribskov M & Schönbach C, Eds. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford.

    Written by

    John-James Wilson

    John-James Wilson

    Vertebrate Zoology at World Museum, National Museums Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Leanna Dixon

    Leanna Dixon

    Tanyptera Project, National Museums Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Gary Hedges

    Gary Hedges

    Tanyptera Project, National Museums Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Don't Miss Out!

    Subscribe to the iBOL Barcode Bulletin for updates on DNA barcoding efforts, the iBOL Consortium, and more.

    [mc4wp_form]

    comment on this article

    The Barcode Bulletin moderates comments to promote an informed and courteous conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, or incoherent comments will be rejected.